Amid calls by some state lawmakers to cut state and destination marketing budgets, the U.S. Travel Association today released the Travel Economic Impact Calculator (TEIC), a tool designed to show the direct impact of an increase or decrease in traveler spending on a state’s economy—and how travel-generated tax revenues directly supports public sector jobs—like firefighters, police officers and public school teachers.

Travel promotion plays an integral role in driving tourism to destinations. Increased investment in travel and tourism promotion attracts more visitors, whose spending creates jobs, fuels the local economy and generates tax revenue supporting vital public services.

Nationwide, in 2016 the travel industry generated $72 billion in local and state tax revenue—enough to pay for the salaries of:

• All 987,000 state and local police and firefighters across the U.S., or;
• All 1.1 million secondary school teachers or;
• 1.2 million (88%) elementary school teachers.

Without these travel-generated revenues, each household would pay $1,250 more in taxes every year.

“Travel is an engine for economic and job growth, and it helps communities maintain a level of service that would require more taxes, had it not been for travel-generated tax revenue,” said U.S. Travel Association President and CEO Roger Dow. “Just a one or two percent decline in travel spending can disrupt a state’s economy at every level—not just jobs at hotels, attractions and restaurants, but also the income generated to pay for public services like police, firefighters and school teachers.”

Just as tourism promotion is proven to increase visitors and their spending, the opposite can happen when tourism marketing budgets are slashed.

“Unfortunately, we have seen this scenario play out in states like Washington, Colorado and Pennsylvania, whose legislatures made a misguided decision to cut tourism promotion budgets dramatically and cost their states tens of thousands of jobs as a result,” said Dow.

“We’re releasing this tool so decision-makers can easily see how small changes in visitation—up or down—can have significant effects for states and communities.

“That’s why it’s alarming to see state legislatures in Florida and Missouri put forth proposals to dramatically reduce their tourism marketing budgets when the return on investment is so clear. As policymakers are contemplating state tourism promotion budgets this legislative season, we urge them not to make ill-informed decisions that could cause decades of damage.”