Global Events · eTN Contacts & Team · Advertising · Submit Articles ·    

Comments


Our current economy is based on stealing the future, selling it in the present, and calling it GDP.
We live on a finite planet, with finite resources, but as a species we seem very very slow to realize that an economy based on infinite growth just can't be sustained indefinitely. The anti-science, anti-global warming comments above ignore the facts of ocean acidification, biodiversity loss, not to mention our ongoing need for clean air and clean water, never mind climate change. Do you have children? If so, wake up and work at becoming a fossil fuel abolitionist, or their future looks pretty bleak for all kinds of reasons.



To quote a semi famous chicken - - "The sky is falling , the sky is falling !

The "real problem" of the world is people so gullible they continue to believe the global warming scam !



After the world war, Great Britian was bankrupt and they managed to get out of it. I'm not saying the situation is wonderful but it is possible to get out of...

I think the bigger problem is how the gov't (and past administrations as well) cannot control their spending. We need cuts in arts funding, foreign aid, and especially the war. We need less gov't so there isn't so much pressure for more taxes...
Tom
http://www.philanthropystar.org/



The 80% /20% split in the vote(at time of posting ) in favour of the recession as more important is troubling .

Perhaps that is why we've reached the brink of enviromental disaster unfortunately as a species we tend to look at our own selfish short term interests before long term matters which lets be frank our grandchildren and later descendants (if they exist ) will be paying for.A variation of this risky thinking got us into the recession in the first place.
Can't believe there are still naysayers who don't believe in global warming but there again some people still believe the world is flat!

Oh well evolution will catch us out if we can't adapt then then we'll go the way of millions of other species .



The recession is real - global warming is a myth perpetuated by arch snake oil salesman, Al Gore.



at this moment... "economic" recovery / stability, is - are key to nurture further "green" ingraining in the global quest for protecting / safeguarding our planet



a leadership crisis (and narrow self interest) not global warming is the day's most significant topic.



The best current research puts the rate of global warming at about 0.6 deg C per century, with a variation of about +/- 0.25 deg which follows the Pacific Decadal Oscillation. This is hardly noticeable. Anthropogenic CO2 plays so small a role in this warming that it's lost in instrument noise; the underlying warming rate reflects a recovery from the Little Ice Age of the 14th-18th centuries.

The sea is rising at a rate just under 2 mm/yr, as it has been doing for centuries, amounting to well under a foot per century. Miami will not be drowned by it in the foreseeable future.

There is no "climate crisis." This question is like asking whether one would rather eat lunch with Jolene Blalock or the Tooth Fairy.



Global Warming was hot (no pun intended) when money was growing like crazy. Nowdays we got real concerns with the economy. We won't really no for years if we are just in a cycle (warming trend) like so many suggest, or have a serious problem. Oh ya, anytime a poster starts with "I have a degree in..." I know it is bullwonkey. Really, nobody truly knows sbout global warming, but we all know the recession is real.



we will survive this.
i've survived many harder circumstances like when i kill the biggest croc in the NT, also when i was run over by william robinsons road train now that HURT.
so we'll live brother



We will recover from the economic crisis.

I do not believe that among the entitled and the greedy Developed World masses - or among the emerging entitled and greedy Chinese - there is the will to do what it takes to recover from the environmental crisis.



Holiday complaints actually recorded by Thomas Cook (Tours) of the UK (are Americans more stupid than this?):

"The beach was too sandy."

"We bought Ray-Ban sunglasses for five euros (US$10.00) from a street trader, only to find out they were fake."

"No-one told us there would be fish in the sea. The children were startled."

"It took us nine hours to fly home from Jamaica to England but it only took the Americans three hours to get home."

"I compared the size of our one-bedroom apartment to our friends' three-bedroom apartment and ours was significantly smaller"

"The brochure stated 'No hairdressers at the hotel.' We're trainee hairdressers - will we be OK staying here?"

"We found the sand was not like the sand in the brochure. Your brochure shows the sand as yellow but it was white."

"We had to queue outside with no air conditioning."

"I was bitten by a mosquito. No-one said they could bite."

"I think it should be explained in the brochure that the local store does not sell proper biscuits like custard creams or ginger nuts."

"On my holiday to Goa in India, I was disgusted to find that almost every restaurant served curry. I don't like spicy food at all."

"We booked an excursion to a water park but no-one told us we had to bring our swimming costumes and towels."



This is a question that people shouldn't even have to answer...it is obvious. The only way there can be an economy is if there are people and if we dont help the environment...then..there will be no people..it may not come for another 10 years or another hundred...but the environment should always come before our petty games of trading stocks and making money to feed our wonderful petty needs. Our environment must be saved before the enconomy...or we will die, slowly and painfully and shame on anyone who can live ignoring the real problems of the world and being absorbed by their greed. Think about this before you vote.



Obviously you have no knowledge of science cause anyone these days who has a degree in science (me)and has knowledge of anything in the science field would counter your staement (also...which parts of the world are you inferring were hotter than that of today)



global warming does not exist, during like, the 1600s it was hotter than it is today



What's disturbing is the enormous gap between what scientists know about the present climate crisis and what people know.
Fact-- human civilization has thrived over the past 10,000 years ONLY because the climate has been stable during this time. The past 10,000 years have been the only STABLE climate period in the Earth's history.
Fact-- This STABILITY is given by the POLAR ICE CAPS which are RAPIDLY MELTING. Scientists used to give us 50 years until they were totally gone, then it became 20, then 10, then 3, and now they are saying they could be gone this summer.
To treat the climate crisis as nothing is to not be well-informed. We are on the brink of rendering our planet inhospitable to human civilization, our water is scarce and polluted, fully HALF of the ocean's coral reefs are dead because of excess CO2 in the air.
The world's scientists agree that unless action is taken THIS YEAR to reverse climate change, we will completely destroy the stability our planet has enjoyed the past 10 millenia.
WAKE UP! The emergency is real and imminent, and we are fools to not act.
Think of it this way: worst case if nothing happens: we suffer economic melthdown, but we have sustainable energy, clean air, and clean water. Worst case if climate change happens: HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF CLIMATE REFUGEES. Only the human mind could possibly think that it's own selfmade economy could be more important than the planet which gives us all.



Stop using Plastic. All plastic shopping bags should be banned unless they are a product from recycled plastic. Also stores must offer free Non-plastic bags for purchases over certain amount. Bags made out of recycled Paper (news papers etc) with plastic lining could also help. Each office/hotel/apartment building must have seperate disposals for Recyclable products and non recyclable products.



I dont get the either or. If people - who mostly lived beyond their capacities for too long - now have less money but more time, isnt that even a chance for a change in travel behaviour and consequently a chance for action on climate change? Airflight contributes to climate change and we fly here and there for a couple of days just because we lack sufficient leisure time. Concepts like annual working hour accounts for instance could encourage long-term holidays with less airflight movements required and would support employers handling their business more flexible than with 40 hours per week commitments. Who better than tourism industry can cope with the fact that people have more leisure time.



I agree with what Barbara is saying and her last paragraph is brilliant. But in my humble opinion, CRAZY is giving trillions of dollars to the same CEO's and presidents of the companies that caused the current global economic meltdown.



Where have you been for the last 20 years? Our world has changed so much for the better as almost everyone is aware that the environment is precious. Climate change is something that has been in existence for trillions of years and will be here for the next trillions and we have no control over it. We had the coldest winter months in history in NJ. There was snow in South Aftica. The are other areas that were warmer. We cannot change these phenominas and to spend trillions of the tzx payers $ on pork projects claiming to help the environment is crazy. Talk with your neighbors and make sure they do the things you want to see done to make this earth better. We all can make a big impact one on one.
The government does not run anything well or honestly, however you can. So do your thing. I am so proud of my family and my neighbors who are wonderful advocates of green ideas and practices. I hope you can be also.



Seriously people! So much denial about the state of our world...can anyone seriously give evidence that the planet is in a better state ecologically now than during the last 'green scare' of the early 90s? We didn't do anything then and we won't now for one simple reason - it's just too painful to change. We probably will still be arguing semantics and data as we stand on the newly tropical islands of Tasmania and New Zealand in 30 years time.



Peter is correct, in that the some of the data being used in the global warming curves are made up and that the computer models have actually been invalidated (the results of the modeling do not match observations). I have personally reviewed some of the papers, including those of Hansen. Many of these authors have committed outright scientific fraud.

Data is also used selectively. If it supports their conclusions, it is included. If it does not support the conclusions, it is left out.

Many papers, including IPCC reports, grossly mislead the reader by ignoring water vapor, which causes about 95% of the global warming effect. It is ignored because the scientists do not know how to account for the great variability from place to place and time to time, so they just assume it to be a constant. Solar energy flux is also usually considered a constant. Turns out that these are bad assumptions.



I agree. the present economic crisi is causing a great discomfort in the sense that it could be likened to very bad
waether or climate change.



I'm not sure what liturature Peter has been reading, but there isn't any great division among scientists. I would definitly suggest to Peter that he personally talk to any of the peoples who reside north of the arctic circle. There are thousands of them in North America, Greelnland, Europe, and Asia who will give better data than any computer model. However, I sincerely hope that Peter is right. And I also hope that one day car manufacturers will produce an SUV which the discharges exhaust into the vehicle, to better keep the carbon out of our atmosphere.



The scientific community is hopelessly divided over the reasons for Global Warming it particular the scientific validity of the computer modelled predictions. Numerous serious international scientific reports raising important questions are ignored and rarely publishised. Figures on ice melt, and temperatures are quoted as fact when they are often fiction. Its very much like a rerun of the Millenium bug panic.
Peter



I don't agree. What does the question even mean?



I also believe climate change to be more important overall, but I do however feel that the economic crisis has pushed it out of top position, but I don't like this fact



So hi here, I think the crisis is good for making movies to show you people. I like to make them and I get funded by the tax people of Germany. I am skilled, see my homepage for more details uwe fans



Well i think we've developed enough land as feuerse measure we need substantial sunstainability of the mass developed and a conservation of the rest of the rest of the resource is required immediately, whick we understand is understood just actions are awaited to be confirmed.



In total agreement with Tervor Truckwell, our fall from Grace is happening and our wasteful ways have to change because we are ruining our beautiful and wonderful world. What sort of world will we wake up to in 20 years time ? Sustainable living is the only way ahead.


Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <h1><h2><cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><img><span>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.
  • You may insert YouTube videos with [youtube:ID]

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image without spaces, also respect upper and lower case.

Premium Partners