US bans canned lion trophy imports from South Africa

Because South Africa was unable to demonstrate the conservation value of canned lion hunting, the United States last week banned the import of all trophies from captive lion hunts in the country.

Because South Africa was unable to demonstrate the conservation value of canned lion hunting, the United States last week banned the import of all trophies from captive lion hunts in the country.

According the the director of the US Fish and Wildlife Services, Dan Ashe, lion trophies may only be imported from exporting nations like South Africa if they can provide evidence of the hunts benefiting the long-term survival of the species in the wild.


โ€˜That burden of proof has not been met,โ€™ said Ash. โ€˜If and when such benefits can be clearly shown, we may reevaluate our position.โ€™
Most recent lion trophies imported into the United States have been from captive populations in South Africa, so the decision will likely substantially reduce the total number of lion trophy imports.

Moves towards the ban began earlier this year when lions were declared as protected under the Endangered Species Act, giving Fish and Wildlife the responsibility to regulate the import of live lions, lion trophies and other parts and derivatives.

The ban does not include the importation of trophies taken from wild or wild-managed populations if they have been authorized by the South African government. โ€˜But let me be clear,โ€™ said Ash, โ€˜we cannot and will not allow trophies into the United States from any nation whose lion conservation programme fails to meet key criteria for transparency, scientific management and effectiveness.โ€™

The Service noted that it had received import permit applications from US hunters seeking prey in Mozambique, Namibia, Zambia and Zimbabwe โ€“ for permits to import sport-hunted lion trophies
โ€˜We are evaluating the sport hunting programmes in those countries,โ€™ said Ash, โ€˜and will only approve those applications if we receive sufficient evidence of long-term benefits to wild lions resulting from those programs.โ€™

In announcing the ban, the US government also expressed concern for wild lions in Africa, and for good reason. The human population of sub-Saharan Africa is projected to more than double by 2050 โ€“ pushing settlements, grazing and agriculture into lion habitats. Even protected areas are affected.



Humans are also depleting the wild prey that supports lions, consuming these animals or selling them as bushmeat. Faced with declining habitat and prey, lions are therefore increasingly targeting livestock and people โ€“ resulting in retaliatory killing.

โ€˜Unless effective measures are taken to protect lions, their prey and habitatโ€™ said Ash, โ€˜wild populations of lions may face extirpation from many parts of their historic range. We understand that securing the lionโ€™s future depends upon finding solutions that recognize the needs of those people and communities who share the landscape with them.โ€™

For this reason, US Fish and Wildlife will be working with partners to protect lions and address the threats they face. This includes efforts to reduce cattle depredation and other lion-related conflicts, while also supporting tourism and other sustainable economic activities involving wild and wild-managed lions.

It will also be expanding its capacity to work with international law enforcement agencies to investigate, arrest and prosecute poachers and traffickers.

About the author

Avatar of Linda Hohnholz

Linda Hohnholz

Editor in chief for eTurboNews based in the eTN HQ.

Share to...