Two bus companies sue Detroit Metro Airport for discrimination

OWOSSO, MI – In a federal lawsuit served on Detroit Metro Airport yesterday, Indian Trails, Inc., and Michigan Flyer, LLC, charged the Wayne County Airport Authority (WCAA) with “corrupt and unlawful

OWOSSO, MI – In a federal lawsuit served on Detroit Metro Airport yesterday, Indian Trails, Inc., and Michigan Flyer, LLC, charged the Wayne County Airport Authority (WCAA) with “corrupt and unlawful retaliatory conduct” against the two bus companies due to their support of people with disabilities in suing the airport for discrimination.

The previous lawsuit last September charged WCAA, which operates Detroit Metro Airport, with violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act in relocating the loading area for Michigan Flyer, AirRide, and SMART buses from curbside at the McNamara Terminal to a distant, inaccessible location in the Ground Transportation Center (GTC) in the parking ramp across the road. The plaintiffs in that caseโ€”which was settled last Octoberโ€”were Michael Harris, a paralyzed veteran, and Karla Hudson, an East Lansing resident who is blind.

The new lawsuit alleges that, after settling the case brought by Hudson and Harris, WCAA “immediately and severely retaliated” against Indian Trails and Michigan Flyer “in blatant violation of the anti-retaliation provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act.” The bus companies maintain that the airport “systematically and relentlessly interfered, disrupted, and undermined their existing business as private companies providing public transportation at DTW.”

Retaliation for Supporting Disabled Riders

Among other things, say Indian Trails and Michigan Flyer, the Detroit airport:

โ€ข Sharply reduced the amount of time their buses could remain at the curb to safely load and unload passengers, which caused passengers leaving the airport to miss their scheduled buses.

โ€ข Forced their buses arriving at the airport to circle the terminal “even when empty spaces designated for such buses in the GTC were available,” causing passengers to unsafely rush to make their departing flights or miss them entirely.

โ€ข Forced their buses to leave before scheduled departure times, forcing passengers to wait extended periods of timeโ€”sometimes hoursโ€”for later buses with available seats.

โ€ข Prohibited their buses from unloading passengers at the Departures Level of McNamara Terminal, which they had previously used when passengers with disabilities needed immediate curbside assistance upon arrival at the airport.

โ€ข Gave competing bus companies preferential drop-off and pick-up locationsโ€” sometimes in illegal no-parking zonesโ€”while denying their buses similar access, even when transporting people with disabilities.

โ€ข Pursued frivolous misdemeanor criminal charges against Michigan Flyer for displaying a sign at its customer service desk that was permitted under the terms of the prior settlement.

โ€ข Retaliated against them by suggesting to the Ann Arbor Area Transportation Authorityโ€”their contractual partner in operating the AirRide bus service between Ann Arbor and DTWโ€”that AAATA should contract with different vendor instead of continuing to do business with them.

Standing Up Against Discrimination

Indian Trails and Michigan Flyer say they supported and participated in Harris and Hudson’s ADA case because they are legally obligated to provide accessible transportation for passengers with disabilities, and the airport had moved the public transportation bus stop to an inaccessible location in the Ground Transportation Center.
Detroit Metro Airport had gone ahead with the move despite protests by hundreds of people with and without disabilities, and despite concerns expressed by Gov. Rick Snyder, the State Transportation Commission, the Michigan Department of Transportation, and other public officials.

In the current lawsuit, Indian Trails and Michigan Flyer are asking the court for a declaration that the airport retaliated against them in violation of the ADA, a permanent injunction preventing any further retaliation, monetary damages, attorney fees and costs.

Motion to Enforce Settlement

Meanwhile, Harris and Hudson have filed a “Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement and Award Attorney’s Fees” in their case. They maintain that WCAA has failed to make agreed-upon changes required by the settlement at the new location for Michigan Flyer, AirRide, and SMART buses in order to make it accessible for people with disabilities. Among other things, they say the airport:

โ€ข Did not install effective heaters in the bus shelters at the new bus stop, which is sometimes exposed to frigid outdoor weather in a parking ramp and is located 600 feet from the nearest indoor waiting area. Passengers with disabilities often must wait at the stop for 30 minutes or more for help from Prospect Airport Services, the company charged with assisting people in wheelchairs and others with disabilities at the airport. This is unsafe for passengers like Harris, who suffers from a spinal cord injury and is unable to sense frostbite on his lower extremities.

โ€ข Did not control the climate in the indoor waiting area of the McNamara Terminal’s Ground Transportation Center as promised. Instead, the airport began allowing other bus companies to board and discharge passengers in a no-parking/no-loading area right outside the waiting room, which created “excessive pedestrian congestion” at the door, forcing the door to stay open, and allowing “cold outdoor air and noxious fumes to flood into the indoor waiting area.”
The motion by Harris and Hudson is pending a decision by U.S. District Court Judge David M. Lawson at the U.S. Courthouse in Detroit.

Related Video

Separately, the National Federation of the Blind of Michigan, which has similar concerns, has produced a video entitled “How Detroit Metro Airport Treats Bus Riders with Disabilities.” It can be viewed online here: https://youtu.be/EZaoaQ2fFe0.

About the author

Avatar of Linda Hohnholz

Linda Hohnholz

Editor in chief for eTurboNews based in the eTN HQ.

Share to...