Events · eTN Team · Advertising · Subscription  
South Africa

Tourism chief disputes airline refunds

Tourism chief disputes airline refunds
southafrica.to

Jul 16, 2008

A "balanced solution" is needed when it comes to compensating airline passengers denied permission to board a flight because it has been overbooked, according to the Southern African Tourism Services Association (Satsa).

If a decision was "skewed" in favour of passengers, ticket prices could increase, Satsa chief executive officer Michael Tatalias said on Tuesday.

Tatalias was reacting to Transport Minister Jeff Radebe's written reply to a question in parliament recently. Radebe had said details regarding compensation would be incorporated in regulations to be promulgated under the Consumer Protection Act.

There is no legislation that requires compensation to be paid to a passenger who has been denied permission to board. In EU countries, airlines have to refund the cost of the ticket and associated costs such as accommodation and meals.

Tatalias said the Consumer Protection Act might end up attracting fewer new foreign airlines.

"Europe can get away with negative rules as there is big and consistent demand to fly to Europe. But there is less demand for South Africa. So we have to work harder to attract airlines."

Satsa hoped it was possible to come up with a solution that protected airlines and passengers.

"So long as the solution is acceptable to all sides we have achieved a positive, as long as the rules are clear and codified in this act.

"Once this is achieved, any overseas or local airline looking to invest will be able to cost in a known and stable factor. If it is too skewed in favour of passengers, there will be the risk of increasing the price of tickets, making airline ticket rules less flexible and more draconian and chasing airlines away."

int.iol.co.za




Comments


Interesting that a tourism services association should be afraid of "skewing (services) in favour of passengers"! Reminds me of the days when restaurants closed for lunch so that their staff could eat.



I agree with Mr Radebe. We must incorporate rules to protect passengers as well as the travel agent. Many airlines are going bankrupt and the pax as well as travel agent has to suffer. The Travel agent has to give a bank guarantee to the airline thru BSP but the airiline refuses to give any bank guarantee to protect the pax or travel agent if they fold-up. These are double standards. I had taken a group of 41 Sr Citizens to South Africa from Mumbai in April'08 and we were to fly to Vic Falls but Nationwide airlines went bankrupt and we were stranded. Even the local agent (ERM Tours SA) initially demanded money from us to extend the stay in SA saying that Sun International Group of Hotels would not refund money in these circumsatnces? It is rather unfortunate that this happened and not good for SA Tourism.


Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
This question is to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.